Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comprehensive framework for thyroid disorder diagnosis: Integrating advanced feature selection, genetic algorithms, and machine learning for enhanced accuracy and other performance matrices.

Ankur Kumar, Sanjay Dhanka, Abhinav Sharma, Anchal Sharma, Surita Maini, Mochammad Fahlevi, Fazla Rabby, Mohammed Aljuaid, Rohit Bansal

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ankur KumarSCEE, IIT Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID 0009-0007-2623-0065
Sanjay DhankaDepartment of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal, Punjab, India.
Abhinav SharmaDepartment of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal, Punjab, India.
Anchal SharmaSCEE, IIT Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Surita MainiDepartment of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal, Punjab, India.
Mochammad FahleviManagement Department, BINUS Online, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-8308
Fazla RabbyDepartment of Management, Stanford Institute of Management and Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2683-7218
Mohammed AljuaidDepartment of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rohit BansalDepartment of Management Studies, Vaish College of Engineering, Rohtak, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid hormones control crucial physiological activities, such as metabolism, oxidative stress, erythropoiesis, thermoregulation, and organ development. Hormonal imbalances may cause serious conditions like cognitive impairment, depression, and nervous system damage. Traditional diagnostic techniques, based on hormone level measurements (TSH, T3, FT4, T4, and FTI), are usually lengthy and laborious. This study uses machine learning (ML) algorithms and feature selection based on GA to improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosing thyroid disorders using the UCI thyroid dataset. Five ML algorithms-LR, RF, SVM, AB, and DT- were tested using two paradigms: (1) default classifiers and (2) hybrid GA-ML models- GA-RF, GA-LR, GA-SVM, GA-DT, and GA-AB. The data pre-processed included handling missing values, feature scaling, and correlation analysis. In this case, the performance metrics used for model evaluation are accuracy, F1 Score, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and Cohen's Kappa with 80% of the dataset to train the model and the rest 20% used to test it. Among the non-hybrid models, RF achieved the highest accuracy, which was 93.93%. The hybrid GA-RF model outperformed all others, achieving a remarkable accuracy of 97.21%, along with superior metrics across all the evaluated parameters. These findings highlight the diagnostic potential of the GA-RF model in providing faster, more accurate, and reliable thyroid disorder detection. The research illustrated the potential of the hybrid GA-ML approaches to improving the clinical diagnostic process while proposing a strong and scalable approach towards thyroid disorder identification.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningThyroid DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID40531844
PMCPMC12176113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.