Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The effect of target transpulmonary driving pressure values on mortality in ARDS patients: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.

Na Liu, Qi Zhang, Huiyong Wang, Renshuang Ding, Xiaoyong Geng, Li Wang, Zhiyong Wang, Mingxing Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Na LiuDepartment of Emergency, Forth hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.
Huiyong WangCritical Disease Data Analysis and Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering Research Center of Hebei Province, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.
Renshuang DingCritical Disease Data Analysis and Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering Research Center of Hebei Province, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.
Xiaoyong GengDepartment of Cardiology, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.
Li WangDepartment of Oncology, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.
Zhiyong WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.
Mingxing FangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-9932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined the effect of target transpulmonary driving pressure on mortality in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, assessing how varying levels of transpulmonary driving pressure influence clinical outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective study utilized data from the MIMIC-IV database to evaluate the relationship between transpulmonary driving pressure and mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Associations between transpulmonary driving pressure levels and 28-day, ICU, and hospital mortality were analyzed. Propensity score matching was employed to balance covariates, while causal mediation analysis assessed whether peak airway pressure mediated the effect of transpulmonary driving pressure on mortality.

resultsAmong 4721 patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, 295 received transpulmonary driving pressure targeting. The optimal transpulmonary driving pressure threshold was identified as 12.5 cmH2O. Patients with transpulmonary driving pressure >12.5 cmH2O had significantly higher 28-day, ICU, and hospital mortality, particularly in those with moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, targeting transpulmonary driving pressure was associated with lower ICU mortality (HR 0.676, 95% CI 0.511-0.894, p = 0.006). Phenotypic analysis showed that elevated transpulmonary driving pressure was linked to worse outcomes in Phenotype-I(High Mechanical Power with Moderate Lung Compliance) and Phenotype-II (High Spontaneous Breathing with Better Lung Compliance), but not in Phenotype-III (Low Tidal Volume with Reduced Lung Compliance). Mediation analysis revealed that 7.0% of the mortality risk associated with transpulmonary driving pressure >12.5 cmH2O was mediated through peak airway pressure.

conclusionTranspulmonary driving pressure exceeding 12.5 cmH2O is associated with higher mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients, with peak airway pressure contributing to this effect.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPressureRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40531833
PMCPMC12176163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.