ArticlePloS one2025
Differences in gait parameters between children with achondroplasia and an age-matched control group of typically developed children in the age range of 6 to 12 years.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For people with achondroplasia, the ability to walk pain-free and longer distances is essential for maintaining independence and quality of life. However, due to shorter extremities and misalignments in the lower limbs, the walking pattern of this cohort is often affected. One possible contributing factor is an imbalanced foot-to-leg ratio. Although these structural differences are well documented, research on their specific impact on gait mechanics remains limited. In particular, no studies have investigated how an imbalanced foot-to-leg ratio, among other potential factors, may influence kinematic and kinetic parameters throughout the gait cycle. Therefore, this study examined gait differences between children with achondroplasia (N = 15) and an age-matched (6-12 y) control group (N = 15). Using a 3D motion capture system (Vicon, 13 cameras) and a modified Plug-in-Gait model, spatio-temporal, kinematic, and kinetic parameters were analyzed. Statistical parametric mapping was applied to identify key moments in the gait cycle where significant deviations occurred between the two cohorts. Results showed that all spatio-temporal parameters, except cadence, differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.05). Most kinematic and kinetic parameters also showed significant differences, particularly around initial contact and toe-off. Notably, kinematic deviations were found at the pelvis, hip, and ankle during initial contact. Around toe-off, ankle kinematics were significantly different (p = 0.006). Kinetic differences at the hip and knee in both planes were also evident around toe-off. These findings suggest that an imbalanced foot-to-leg ratio may influence gait patterns, particularly during initial contact and toe-off phases. However, additional factors contributing to these deviations remain to be identified. Further research is necessary to elucidate these influences, which could support the development of more targeted and individualized therapeutic interventions for individuals with ACH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.