ArticlePloS one2025
Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With growing uncertainty in global trade, improving access to domestic capital markets has become an important way to manage financial risk spillovers. This study examines how the registration system reform affects the finance sector's risk spillovers to other 10 sectors in China's stock market using a dual machine learning model. The findings include: (1) The finance sector's risk spillovers vary over time and are heterogeneous. Risk spillovers rapidly intensify two months after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the average net ∆CoVaR value changing from -0.001 to -0.006. The finance sector mainly accepts risk from the public utility sector and exports risk to the other 9 sectors, with the highest spillovers going to the communication and information technology sectors, showing extreme net ΔCoVaR values around -0.02. (2) The registration system reform increases the finance sector's risk spillover effect, and this conclusion remains the same after a series of robustness tests. (3) Sector heterogeneity tests show that the reform boosts the finance sector's risk spillovers to cyclical sectors and sectors with a low proportion of strategic emerging companies but reduces risk spillovers to midstream and supportive sectors. Finally, some suggestions and implications are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.