Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Text speaks louder: Insights into personality from natural language processing.

David Saeteros, David Gallardo-Pujol, Daniel Ortiz-Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David SaeterosDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3373-4628
David Gallardo-PujolDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0095-8879
Daniel Ortiz-MartínezDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5659-6702

Funding

Government of Catalonia 2021SGR0709Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain PID2020-119755GB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, advancements in natural language processing (NLP) have enabled new approaches to personality assessment. This article presents an interdisciplinary investigation that leverages explainable AI techniques, particularly Integrated Gradients, to scrutinize NLP models' decision-making processes in personality assessment and verify their alignment with established personality theories. We compare the effectiveness of typological (MBTI) and dimensional (Big Five) models, utilizing the Essays and MBTI datasets. Our methodology applies log-odds ratio with Informative Dirichlet Prior (IDP) and fine-tuned transformer-based models (BERT and RoBERTa) to classify personality traits from textual data. Our results demonstrate moderate to high accuracy in personality prediction, with NLP models effectively identifying personality signals in text in line with previous studies. Our findings reveal theory-coherent patterns in language use associated with different personality traits, while highlighting important biases in the MBTI dataset that yielded less robust results. The study underscores the potential of NLP in enhancing personality psychology and emphasizes the need for further interdisciplinary research to fully realize the capabilities of these transparent technologies.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPersonalityHumansPersonality Assessment

Identifiers

PMID40531810
PMCPMC12176201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.