Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531801›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging.

Wenfeng Mai, Xiaole Fan, Lingtao Zhang, Jian Li, Liting Chen, Xiaoyu Hua, Dong Zhang, Hengguo Li, Minxiang Cai, Changzheng Shi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wenfeng MaiMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaole FanDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lingtao ZhangMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Liting ChenMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyu HuaMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Dong ZhangMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Hengguo LiMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Minxiang CaiClinical Research Platform for Interdiscipline of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Changzheng ShiMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangning LiuClinical Research Platform for Interdiscipline of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors (PGTs) is crucial for surgical planning since malignant tumors require more extensive excision. Though fine-needle aspiration biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its sensitivity in detecting malignancies is limited. While Deep learning (DL) models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in medicine, they are less studied for parotid gland tumors. This study used a 2.5D imaging approach (Incorporating Inter-Slice Information) to train a DL model to differentiate between benign and malignant PGTs.

methodsThis retrospective study included 122 parotid tumor patients, using MRI and clinical features to build predictive models. In the traditional model, univariate analysis identified statistically significant features, which were then used in multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors. The model was built using four-fold cross-validation. The deep learning model was trained using 2D and 2.5D imaging approaches, with a transformer-based architecture employed for transfer learning. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and confusion matrix metrics.

resultsIn the traditional model, boundary and peritumoral invasion were identified as independent predictors for PGTs, and the model was constructed based on these features. The model achieved an AUC of 0.79 but demonstrated low sensitivity (0.54). In contrast, the DL model based on 2.5D T2 fat-suppressed images showed superior performance, with an AUC of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.78.

conclusionThe 2.5D imaging technique, when integrated with a transformer-based transfer learning model, demonstrates significant efficacy in differentiating between PGTs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingParotid NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParotid GlandRetrospective StudiesROC Curve2.5D imagingdeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingparotid tumors

Identifiers

PMID40531801
PMCPMC12180351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.