Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531757›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2025

The utility of an artificial intelligence model based on decision tree and evolution algorithm to evaluate steatotic liver disease in a primary care setting.

A C Goulart, A P Alencar, G Tunes, L L T Bianchi, M H Miname, C M Padilha, J M S Pescuma, A L C C Rodrigues, B B Henares, M S de Almeida and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

A C GoulartCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-5210
A P AlencarInstituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-0426
G TunesInstituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3088-3134
L L T BianchiCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-5640
M H MinameCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4487-5701
C M PadilhaCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3054-7547
J M S PescumaCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-2386
A L C C RodriguesCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-3807
B B HenaresCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-2653
M S de AlmeidaCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-5700
T A O MachadoCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-127X
D H SyllosCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-9109
Y P WangDepartamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-8312
M RienzoCentro de Acompanhamento da Saúde e Check-up, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5852-8305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many ways of classifying steatotic liver disease (SLD) with metabolic conditions have been proposed. Thus, SLD-related variables were verified using a decision tree. We tested if the suggested components of the actual classification (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, MASLD) are also present in young and middle-aged adults. In a cross-sectional study involving 6,839 adults (median age: 46 years, 69.5% men) in a primary care setting, a decision tree was created to determine potential clinical and laboratory variables related to SLD. The odds ratio (OR) with a respective 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated for both sexes. SLD frequency was 26.6% (23% in men). More variables and with higher ORs for the association with SLD were identified in women: category 1 (body mass index (BMI) ≥29 kg/m2, age <51 years, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥0.195 mg/dL): OR=10.9, 95%CI: 4.40-26.6; category 2 (BMI <9 kg/m2, metabolic syndrome (MS), age ≥50 years, neck circumference (NC) ≥36 cm): OR=8.1, 95%CI: 2.2-29.9; and category 3 (BMI ≥29 kg/m2, age <51 y-old, dyslipidemia, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) <42 mg/dL): OR=4.7, 95%CI: 2.20-10.7. For men: category 1 (waist circumference (WC) ≥101 cm, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <28 mg/dL, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥5.7%): OR=4.7, 95%CI: 2.8-7.9; and category 2 (WC ≥101 cm, ALT ≥28 mg/dL): OR=3.2, 95%CI: 2.5-4.0). The decision tree identified more variables related to SLD, particularly in women, such as age of more than 50 years, elevated hs-CRP, and NC≥36 cm than variables related to MASLD.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDecision TreesFatty LiverAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40531757
PMCPMC12172153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.