Observational studyJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2025
Depression and anxiety in adolescents with cystic fibrosis in Brazil: prevalence, stability over time, and relationship with treatment adherence.
Observational study in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mental Health in Cystic Fibrosis in the Modulator Era: Epidemiology, Prognostic Significance, and Therapeutic Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comprehensive care in cystic fibrosis: mental health assessments.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDepression and anxiety have been documented in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), jeopardizing treatment adherence. To date, no studies have assessed the prevalence of psychosocial issues in adolescents with CF in Brazil. We sought to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety in adolescents with CF in Brazil, as well as the impact of depression and anxiety on treatment adherence.
methodsThis was a multicenter, prospective, observational, longitudinal study conducted between 2017 and 2019 at 14 CF referral centers in Brazil. We used standardized tools such as the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (for depression), the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (for anxiety), and the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (for treatment adherence) in order to collect data on 218 CF patients at two different time points.
resultsThe prevalence of depression was 19.1% at time point 1 and 15.4% at time point 2. The prevalence of anxiety was 19.1% at time point 1 and 18.0% at time point 2. Depression and anxiety were significantly higher in female patients and lower in those who underwent home physiotherapy or had psychological support. Significant correlations were found between depression and anxiety at both time points, the associations being strongest at time point 1 (r = 0.68; p < 0.001). Most (66.7%) of the study participants reported low adherence to treatment, and the remainder reported either average adherence (in 28%) or high adherence (in 5.3%). Depression and anxiety showed inverse correlations with treatment adherence.
conclusionsThe prevalence of depression and anxiety in adolescents with CF in Brazil appears to be similar to that reported in other countries, being higher in females and lower in those undergoing home physiotherapy or receiving psychological care. Depression and anxiety appear to correlate with lower treatment adherence. Treating psychosocial issues may effectively improve rates of treatment adherence in adolescents with CF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.