ReviewArquivos de gastroenterologia2025
PERIOPERATIVE NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT IN GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY - WHY IS IT ESSENTIAL?
Review in Arquivos de gastroenterologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prehabilitation in Obese Patients with Ventral Hernia: A Narrative Review and Proposal of a Clinical Algorithm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Scoping Review of Implementation Strategies, Clinical Outcomes, and Health System Impact.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing Perioperative Nutrition in Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery: An ERAS-Focused Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalnutrition, sarcopenia, and obesity can negatively impact the course of gastrointestinal surgery, increasing the risk of postoperative complications such as anastomotic dehiscence, reoperations, increased mortality and morbidity, and prolonged hospitalizations, leading to higher healthcare costs. Weight loss greater than 10% in the previous six months is a prognostic indicator of mortality in gastrointestinal surgeries and one of the few modifiable variables. Preoperative malnutrition prevalence ranges from 17% to 20%, increasing the risk of infectious complications, especially in malignant diseases. Obesity, i.e., body mass index (BMI) ≥30.0 kg/m2, also impairs the clinical course, contributing to postoperative complications and hospital mortality. Enhanced recovery protocols, like ERAS, are becoming standard practice, with preoperative nutritional interventions crucial for improving surgical outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the ideal preoperative dietary intervention, but regardless of nutritional status, all individuals are eligible for preoperative screening. The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) proposes to assess malnutrition using signs and symptoms, including unintentional weight loss, edema, loss of fat and body muscle mass, and fluid retention, in addition to BMI ≤18.5 kg/m2. In the case of malnutrition, the use of oral supplementation, enteral nutrition (EN), or parenteral nutrition (PN) is recommended, even if there is a need to postpone surgery. This article discusses the importance of nutritional status screening and perioperative nutritional support, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to improve patients' quality of life and reduce postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.