ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025
Management performance in public oral health actions and services: a cross-sectional study in the Serra Catarinense region, Brazil, 2022.
Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate municipal health service management performance regarding public oral health actions and services.
methodsCross-sectional study conducted in the 18 municipalities of Serra Catarinense region, Brazil, in 2022, with health secretaries, primary care and oral health coordinators; performance was self-assessed considering three dimensions (planning, monitoring and evaluation, and specific actions) and classified as poor (<2), medium (2-3) and good (>3); analyses were carried out according to management functions, using Kruskal-Wallis and Scheffé means comparison tests and analysis of variance, taking a 5% significance level.
resultsOverall performance was evaluated as medium, with higher averages for planning (2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.32; 2.69); the specific actions dimension had the poorest performance (2.28 95%CI 2.08; 2.48). Health secretaries had higher performance averages when compared to coordinators of other functions (3.22; p-valor 0.007).
conclusionHealth service manager performance was considered to be medium, with differences depending on the managers' role. Specific oral health actions had the poorest performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.