Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531673›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2025

A multicentre comparative study of serological methods for diagnosing Chagas disease in Brazil.

Alejandro Luquetti Ostermayer, Fernanda Alvarenga Cardoso Medeiros, Jacqueline Araújo Domingos Iturra, Job Alves de Souza Filho, Leonardo Maia Leony, Larissa de Carvalho Medrado Vasconcelos, Liliane da Rocha Siriano, Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares, Vinícius Silva Belo, Andréa Silvestre de Sousa and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Double-antigen sandwich ELISA based on chimeric antigens for detection of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in human sera - A phase II study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Stage-InformedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alejandro Luquetti OstermayerUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Hospital Universitário, Núcleo de Estudos em Doença de Chagas, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Fernanda Alvarenga Cardoso MedeirosFundação Ezequiel Dias, Serviço de Doenças Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Jacqueline Araújo Domingos IturraFundação Ezequiel Dias, Serviço de Doenças Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Job Alves de Souza FilhoFundação Ezequiel Dias, Serviço de Doenças Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Leonardo Maia LeonyFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Laboratório Avançado de Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Larissa de Carvalho Medrado VasconcelosFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Laboratório Avançado de Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Liliane da Rocha SirianoUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Hospital Universitário, Núcleo de Estudos em Doença de Chagas, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Suelene Brito do Nascimento TavaresUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Hospital Universitário, Núcleo de Estudos em Doença de Chagas, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Vinícius Silva BeloUniversidade Federal de São João Del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brasil.
Andréa Silvestre de SousaFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fred Luciano Neves SantosFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Laboratório Avançado de Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-0818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease (CD), a neglected tropical disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, remains a significant often underdiagnosed public health challenge in endemic regions, affecting millions globally. Accurate and timely diagnosis is critical, but the performance of existing diagnostic methods varies widely in sensitivity and specificity.

objectivesThis multicentre study assessed the diagnostic performance of 17 serological assays for detecting anti-T. cruzi antibodies.

methodsCommercial enzyme immunoassays (EIA), indirect haemagglutination assays (IHA), indirect immunofluorescence assays (IIF), rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), and a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) were included in this study.

findingsSome EIA-based tests achieved 100% sensitivity, while IHAs and IIFs demonstrated reduced specificity. CMIA exhibited 100% sensitivity, highlighting its potential as a robust screening tool. Combining EIAs with IHAs or IIFs improved overall sensitivity, often surpassing 99%, although specificity remained variable. Cross-reactivity with other parasitic diseases posed challenges to specificity, particularly in assays employing crude antigens. MAIN

conclusionsThese findings emphasise the importance of tailoring diagnostic tool selection to regional epidemiological contexts and advancing antigen refinement to enhance diagnostic accuracy and accessibility, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseTrypanosoma cruziBrazilFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID40531673
PMCPMC12165711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.