Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531608›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2025

Review of the role of submucosal injection materials in digestive endoscopy.

Deli Wu, Xiaohui Qin, Zhulin Xu, Haoran Wei, Xianglin Ding, Deqing Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deli WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3176-9963
Xiaohui QinDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0008-6482-5868
Zhulin XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0007-5923-0539
Haoran WeiSchool of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4894-326X
Xianglin DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Suzhou Yongding Hospital, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9500-0219
Deqing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0002-9888-853X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection techniques have been extensively applied in the treatment of precancerous lesions and early-stage cancers in the digestive tract. Both endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and most endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) procedures rely heavily on submucosal injection-a critical step that ensures complete lesion removal and helps prevent postoperative bleeding and perforation. This technique has also greatly contributed to the advancement and widespread adoption of endoscopic procedures. The selection of appropriate submucosal injection materials merits attention. This paper expounds on the current research status of submucosal injection materials and envisions the future development directions of submucosal injection materials.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansInjectionsIntestinal MucosaDigestive endoscopyendoscopic mucosal resectionendoscopic submucosal dissectionendoscopic surgerygastrointestinal cancerssubmucosal injection materials

Identifiers

PMID40531608
PMCPMC12180324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.