ArticleEndocrine connections2025
Hyperprolactinemia caused by extra-pituitary prolactin secretion: a systematic review.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to summarize the clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as the treatment and therapeutic outcomes, of hyperprolactinemia caused by ectopic prolactin secretion. Case reports of patients with hyperprolactinemia caused by extra-pituitary prolactin secretion were collected by conducting searches in three databases using the terms (ectopic prolactin secretion) OR (ectopic hyperprolactinemia) OR (ectopic prolactinoma). Fifty-two cases were included (age: 45.5 years (34-55.25), baseline serum prolactin level: 218 ng/mL (110.3-680.5)). Extra-pituitary prolactin-secreting sites include ectopic pituitary adenomas (age: 55 years (47-65), baseline prolactin level: 382 ng/mL (200-1,598)) and non-pituitary-derived extracranial lesions (age: 38 years (30-45.5), baseline prolactin level: 148 ng/mL (75.25-246)). The most common symptoms of the two types of patients are, respectively, intracranial mass effect and galactorrhea or amenorrhea. 42.3% of cases received dopamine agonists as initial treatment, and among them, all patients with non-pituitary-derived lesions failed to achieve normalization in prolactin levels by receiving medication alone. 38.5% of cases received surgery as initial treatment, and 70% achieved an immediate decrease in prolactin level. In conclusion, hyperprolactinemia caused by ectopic prolactin secretion is rare, but it should still be considered in patients with hyperprolactinemia of unclear cause. Age, baseline prolactin levels, major symptoms, histology, pathology, and therapeutic outcomes varied between patients with prolactin-secreting ectopic pituitary adenomas and non-pituitary-derived lesions. Hyperprolactinemia caused by the latter had a female predominance. Dopamine agonists were effective for most ectopic pituitary adenomas, while patients with non-pituitary-derived lesions tended to resist dopamine agonists and responded well to surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.