Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531571›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

How Information Exposure Shapes Risk Perceptions and Vaccination Intentions Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Doug Cheung, Luyao Xie, Lijuan Wang, Siyu Chen, Xinge Li, Zheng Zhang, Xinyue Chen, Shen Ge, Fuk-Yuen Yu, Yuan Fang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Doug Cheung *Centre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0003-7657-3710
Luyao Xie *Centre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-5509-3732
Lijuan WangBeijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-9735-0696
Siyu ChenCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-6271-1858
Xinge LiBeijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5563-0651
Zheng ZhangBeijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8127-0241
Xinyue ChenBeijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2406-703X
Shen GeBeijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1597-0114
Fuk-Yuen YuCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-7869-0281
Yuan FangDepartment of Health and Physical Education, the Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0003-1154-5076
Zihuang ChenDanlan Goodness, Beijing, China, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-5838-1091
Zhennan LiHongshiliu Goodness, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-7111-8104
Fenghua SunDepartment of Health and Physical Education, the Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-5251-4087
Phoenix MoCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-9822-5424
Yingjie LiuBeijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-6025-2581
Zixin WangCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-1158-2304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to information about mpox may shape distinct perceptual processes that influence vaccination intent. Understanding how such information impacts perceived risk and vaccination intention is crucial for designing effective risk communication and public health messaging, particularly among populations at high risk such as gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM).

objectiveThis study examined the specific pathways through which mpox information exposure and associated perceptual processes influence vaccination intent. Differences between GBMSM in Beijing and Hong Kong were also examined to explore potential contextual influences.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of mpox-unvaccinated GBMSM in Hong Kong (n=470) and Beijing (n=519) between November 2023 and March 2024. Structural equation modeling was conducted to estimate the direct and indirect effects of information exposure, perceptual processes (eg, perceived control and threat perceptions), and perceived risk on vaccination intent. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used to estimate the effect measure modification by city.

resultsExposure to positive mpox information significantly enhanced perceived control (β=0.33; P=.001) and increased vaccination intention through heightened perceived risk of contracting mpox (β=0.27; P<.001) in the following 6 months. The indirect effect of positive information exposure on vaccination intent via perceived control and risk was significant in Hong Kong (B=0.01; Wald test: Z=3.05 and P=.002) but not in Beijing (B=-0.01; P=.25). Conversely, negative information exposure primarily increased threat perceptions (Hong Kong: B=0.33 and P=.001; Beijing: B=0.93 and P<.001) but did not consistently translate to increased perceived risk of contracting mpox (Hong Kong: B=-0.10 and P=.31; Beijing: B=0.20 and P=.11). Notable contextual differences emerged between Beijing and Hong Kong-participants in Beijing reported higher levels of information exposure (eg, international mpox statistics; mean score 2.17, SD 0.97 vs 1.79, SD 0.89; P<.001) and more nonregular sex partners (mean 2.20, SD 6.73 vs 1.65, SD 3.37; P=.02), but the associations among information exposure, perceived risk, and vaccination intent were weaker than in Hong Kong participants.

conclusionsPositive mpox-related information strongly promotes vaccination intent by enhancing perceived control and amplifying perceived risk, particularly in settings with accessible vaccination programs such as Hong Kong. Conversely, negative information appears less effective in driving vaccination intention. Tailored, stigma-free communication is crucial for improving vaccination uptake, especially in mainland China, where subsidized vaccines are scarce and perceptual pathways linking information exposure to vaccination intent are relatively weak. Enhancing access to vaccines and addressing contextual barriers can further optimize the impact of such interventions.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleIntentionMpox, MonkeypoxPerceptionSexual and Gender MinoritiesVaccinationAdultBeijingCross-Sectional StudiesHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesgay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with menGBMSMmpoxmultigroup structural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID40531571
PMCPMC12223458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.