Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531531›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Service Use Among Adolescents.

Yanlei Ma, Cristian Ramos, Hefei Wen, Janet R Cummings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanlei MaHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cristian RamosRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Hefei WenHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Janet R CummingsRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The delivery of mental health services to US adolescents has changed significantly in recent years, especially with the increased use of telemental health. More data are needed to understand the implications for racial and ethnic differences in adolescent mental health care use. Objective: To examine racial and ethnic differences in mental health service use among US adolescents in the most recent national survey data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used 2022 to 2023 US national survey data to estimate racial and ethnic differences in mental health service use through weighted logistic regressions, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and health status. Adolescents participating in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health in 2022 to 2023 were included. Exposure: Racial and ethnic group. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dichotomous indicators of mental health treatment type included receipt of any mental health visit (medical setting), prescription medication, support group, or peer support specialist or recovery coach service. Treatment settings were assessed with indicators of mental health services received in outpatient, telehealth, school, inpatient, and emergency department settings. Results: The overall sample included a total of 23 541 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (8351 aged 14-15 years [weighted percentage = 35.1%]; 12 167 male [weighted percentage = 51.1%]; 6057 Hispanic [weighted percentage = 26.0%], 1202 non-Hispanic Asian, Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander [weighted percentage = 6.2%], 3239 non-Hispanic Black [weighted percentage = 13.8%], 10 756 non-Hispanic White [weighted percentage = 49.7%], and 2287 other non-Hispanic race or ethnicity [weighted percentage = 4.3%]), of whom 5994 individuals had experienced a major depressive episode. The model-adjusted percentage of adolescents receiving any mental health visit was 31.7% (95% CI, 30.4%-33.1%) among non-Hispanic White adolescents and was significantly lower among members of racial and ethnic minority groups, ranging from 21.9% (95% CI, 19.5%-24.3%) among non-Hispanic Black adolescents to 25.6% (95% CI, 23.6%-27.6%) among Hispanic adolescents (all P < .001). Significant differences were also seen in prescription medication use and receipt of care in outpatient, school, and telemental health settings. For example, 17.0% (95% CI, 16.0%-18.0%) of non-Hispanic White adolescents received a telemental health visit after adjustment, but this percentage ranged from 8.1% (95% CI, 5.4%-10.8%) among non-Hispanic Asian, Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander adolescents to 12.0% (95% CI, 10.4%-13.6%) among Hispanic adolescents (all P < .001). Few to no racial or ethnic differences were observed in receipt of mental health services from support groups, peer support specialists or recovery coaches, inpatient or residential settings, or emergency departments. Similar patterns were observed among adolescents with past major depressive episodes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, substantial racial and ethnic differences were observed in US adolescent mental health service use after the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in psychotropic medication use and clinical outpatient, school, and telemental health settings. These findings highlight the need to improve mental health access for adolescent members of racial and ethnic minority groups.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareRacial GroupsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40531531
PMCPMC12177673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.