ArticleJAMA network open2025
Trends and Key Factors Associated With Racial and Ethnic Differences in Life's Essential 8 Scores.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial/ethnic differences in Life's Essential 8 and polysocial risk as an effect modifier among women of reproductive age.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Attenuation of Black-White Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Total Mortality by Life's Essential 8.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in Cardiovascular Health Metrics in Italy, 2015-2024: A Ten-Year Report from the Longevity Check-Up (Lookup) 8+ Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in childhood cardiovascular health: evidence of the role of social disadvantage from NHANES 2013-2018.BMC medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Significant racial and ethnic differences exist in Life's Essential 8 (LE8), but the trends in these differences over time are not well understood. Additionally, the key components of LE8 associated with these differences are unclear. Objectives: To evaluate trends in racial and ethnic differences in LE8 over a 10-year period and to identify the primary factors associated with the LE8 differences. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial population-based cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2011 to 2020 that included adults aged 20 to 79 years. The analysis was performed between March and October 2024. Exposure: Self-reported race and ethnicity. Main Outcome and Measures: Trends in racial and ethnic differences in LE8 and primary factors associated with the differences. Results: The median (IQR) age of the 16 104 participants was 46 (32-59) years; 8262 (51.1%) were women; 1974 (5.2%) were Asian, 3918 (10.9%) were Black, 4144 (15.7%) were Latino/Hispanic, and 6068 (68.2%) were White. From 2011 to 2020, Asian adults had the highest LE8 score (71.2; 95% CI, 70.3-72.0), followed by White (67.7; 95% CI, 66.9-68.6) and Latino/Hispanic (65.9; 95% CI, 61.3-62.7) adults, and Black adults (62.0) had the lowest LE8 score. These racial and ethnic differences in LE8 overall score did not significantly change from 2011 to 2020. However, the differences in several individual components of LE8 changed significantly. For example, the Latino/Hispanic vs White difference in sleep health score significantly increased, from -1.25 to -4.38, with a descriptive difference-of-differences of -3.12 (95% CI, -5.83 to -0.42; P = .02). In 2017 to 2020, all but blood lipids and nicotine exposure were negatively associated factors (z scores <0) for the Black vs White difference; nicotine exposure was the key positive (z score = 1.01), while physical activity was the key negative (z score = -1.01) factor associated with the Latino/Hispanic vs White difference; nicotine exposure (z score = 2.59) and diet (z score = 2.12) were the primary positive factors associated with Asian vs White difference. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, racial and ethnic differences in overall LE8 scores compared with White adults remained largely unchanged from 2011 to 2020. These differences were associated with varying components across different racial and ethnic groups, emphasizing the need for targeted, group-specific interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.