Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2026
Dupilumab Efficacy in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Prior Swallowed Topical Corticosteroid Use: A Subgroup Analysis.
Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Pediatrics.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSwallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs) are commonly used to treat eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE); however, not all patients respond and others may be intolerant or have contraindications. We assessed dupilumab efficacy in children with EoE with prior swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) use and with prior inadequate response, intolerance, and/or contraindication (IRIC) to STCs in the phase 3 EoE KIDS study.
methodsEligible patients were aged 1-11 years with EoE unresponsive to proton-pump inhibitors. In part A, patients were randomized to weight-tiered higher-exposure or lower-exposure dupilumab, or placebo up to week (W)16. In part B, dupilumab groups continued treatment, whereas patients receiving placebo switched to higher-exposure or lower-exposure dupilumab through W52. Efficacy by prior STC status was assessed at W16 and W52.
resultsOf 102 patients, 82 (80%) received prior STCs and 59 (58%) had prior IRIC to STCs. At W16, higher-exposure dupilumab improved rates of histologic remission vs placebo in patients with prior STC use (60.7% vs 0.0%, nominal P < 0.0001) and prior IRIC to STCs (60.9% vs 0.0%, nominal P < 0.0001). Secondary endoscopic and histologic outcomes were similar. Responses were maintained at W52 with higher-exposure dupilumab, with improvements observed in patients who switched from placebo to higher-exposure dupilumab. Results were similar or numerically lower with lower-exposure dupilumab. Findings seemed comparable in those without prior STC use or prior IRIC, although patient numbers were small. Dupilumab safety was consistent with the known safety profile. DISCUSSION: Dupilumab may be an effective treatment in children with EoE with prior STC use or prior IRIC to STCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.