Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531440›Full record

SynthesisPaediatric drugs2025

A Systematic Review of Anti-TNF and Anti-IL-6 Treatments for Pediatric Takayasu Arteritis: Addressing a Therapeutic Dilemma.

Ezgi Deniz Batu, Seher Sener

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ezgi Deniz BatuDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. ezgidenizbatu@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-2363
Seher SenerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-8996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTakayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare large-vessel vasculitis primarily affecting young female patients, with pediatric cases being even rarer. Biologic therapies, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) agents, have become integral to TAK treatment; however, their use in children is not well supported by robust data due to the rarity of the disease. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use, effectiveness, and safety of anti-TNF drugs and tocilizumab in the treatment of pediatric TAK.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases from their inception until 15 December 2024. Studies were eligible if they included pediatric patients with TAK (diagnosed before 18 years of age) treated with anti-TNF or anti-IL-6 drugs and reported clinical outcomes. Clinical trials, observational studies, case series, and reports were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Only English articles were analyzed. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and reporting, a narrative synthesis was performed.

resultsA total of 94 reports involving 225 pediatric patients with TAK who received 262 treatment courses of biologic treatment were included. Anti-TNF drugs were more frequently used than tocilizumab (74.2% versus 36.9%, p < 0.001). Both groups showed comparable effectiveness, with clinical improvement observed in 64.9% of anti-TNF drug and 70.9% of tocilizumab treatment courses (p = 0.438). The frequency of relapse was also similar between the two groups (~50% in both groups, p = 0.472). Hypertension was more prevalent in the anti-TNF group (p = 0.004), while concurrent glucocorticoid administration was more frequent in the tocilizumab group (p = 0.024). Infliximab was the most frequently used anti-TNF drug, with a higher proportion of patients showing improvement compared with adalimumab (71.1% versus 45.5%). Adverse events were only reported with infliximab (n = 3), including allergic and infusion reactions. LIMITATIONS: The evidence is primarily based on case reports and series, which might have introduced selection and publication bias. Additionally, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria, treatment protocols, and outcome definitions limits the comparability of results across studies.

conclusionDespite the higher frequency of anti-TNF drug use, both therapies exhibit similar clinical outcomes, highlighting the potential of tocilizumab as an equally effective alternative in pediatric TAK management. Long-term head-to-head studies are needed to optimize the data regarding biologic treatment strategies in pediatric TAK.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterleukin-6 InhibitorsTakayasu ArteritisTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAdalimumabAdolescentChildFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInfliximabInterleukin-6 InhibitorstocilizumabTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40531440
PMCPMC12378403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.