ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2025
Relations between Peer Group Status Hierarchy and Loneliness in Chinese and Canadian Adolescents: The Role of Group Support.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peer stress and adolescent deviant behaviors: Unraveling the roles of loneliness and stress mindset.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Article
- The Folk Sociological Imagination: Manufacturing Agency Through Smoking Among Chinese Adolescents.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Status hierarchy, defined as within-group differentiation in individual status, ranging from egalitarian to hierarchical, is a common phenomenon in adolescents' peer groups. However, the implications of peer group status hierarchy for individual adjustment remain unclear in different social and cultural contexts. This two-wave longitudinal study with an interval of 10 months aimed to explore how peer group status hierarchy was associated with loneliness and how group support mediated the associations in Chinese and Canadian adolescents. Participants were fourth- to eighth-grade students in urban China (n = 787; 343 girls; Mage = 12.55 years) and Canada (n = 1033; 589 girls; Mage = 11.81 years). Data on group status hierarchy, group support, and loneliness were obtained from self-reports. Results indicated that greater status hierarchy within groups was associated with higher loneliness in both countries. However, the mediating effect of group support differed. In Canada, greater group status hierarchy predicted lower peer support, leading to increased loneliness, whereas in China, greater status hierarchy predicted higher peer support, which subsequently reduced loneliness. These findings highlight both similarities and differences in the functional meanings of adolescents' peer group hierarchy in Chinese and North American societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40531421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.