ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2025
Effects of introducing a new reimbursement scheme on pharmaceutical treatment for osteoporosis after hip fracture.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFracture Liaison Service (FLS) programs are beneficial for reducing the frequency of subsequent fractures and mortality in post-hip fracture patients. The aim of this study was to investigate recent changes in the rate of pharmaceutical treatment for osteoporosis in post-hip fracture surgery patients in the absence of FLS programs compared to the previous 10 and 20 years, and whether introduction of a new reimbursement scheme in hip fracture care, launched in 2022 by the Japanese government, improved the pharmaceutical treatment rate after surgical intervention. MATERIALS AND
methodsStudy 1 included 1490 post-hip fracture patients in seven hospitals without an FLS program. Study 2 included 396 osteoporosis patients who were covered by the new reimbursement scheme at five of the seven hospitals. Treatment-related variables and the number of patients who received the different pharmaceutical treatments at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from the hospital were examined.
resultsTwo hundred and thirty-two of 1474 patients received anti-osteoporotic medication at hospital discharge, which was not a significant improvement in the rate of pharmaceutical treatment in comparison with that in our previous studies over 20 years. On the other hand, introduction of the new reimbursement scheme at hospitals significantly improved the rate of pharmaceutical treatment, with 263 of the 391 patients receiving anti-osteoporotic medication at discharge, as well as a significant improvement.
conclusionWe demonstrated a significant improvement in the pharmaceutical treatment rate for osteoporosis in post-hip fracture surgery patients after introduction of the new reimbursement scheme launched by the Japanese government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40531363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.