Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531356›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025

Divisive attenuation based on noisy sensorimotor predictions accounts for excess variability in self-touch.

Nicola Valè, Ivan Tomić, Zahara Gironés, Daniel M Wolpert, Konstantina Kilteni, Paul M Bays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vision Fine-Tunes Predictions of Bimanual Self-Touch.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola ValèDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2364-5990
Ivan TomićDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6046-9642
Zahara GironésDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Daniel M WolpertZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2011-2790
Konstantina KilteniDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Paul M BaysDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4684-4893

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) TICKLISHUMAN (101039152)European Research Council 101039152Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When one part of the body exerts force on another part, the resulting tactile sensation is perceived as weaker than when the same force is applied by an external agent. This phenomenon has been studied using a force matching task, in which observers were first exposed to an external force on a passive finger and then instructed to reproduce the sensation by directly pressing on the passive finger with a finger of the other hand: healthy participants consistently exceeded the original force level. However, this exaggeration of the target force was not observed if the observer generated the matching force indirectly, by adjusting a joystick or slider that controlled the force output of a motor. Here, we present the first detailed computational account of the processes leading to the exaggeration of target forces in the force-matching task, incorporating attenuation of sensory signals based on motor predictions. The model elucidates previously unappreciated contributions of multiple sources of noise, including memory noise, in determining matching force output, and it shows that quantifying attenuation as the discrepancy between direct and indirect self-generated forces isolates its predictive component. Our computational account makes the prediction that attenuated sensations will display greater trial-to-trial variability than unattenuated ones because they incorporate additional noise from motor prediction. Quantitative model fitting of new and existing force-matching data confirmed the prediction of excess variability in self-generated forces and provided evidence for a divisive rather than subtractive mechanism of attenuation, while highlighting its predictive nature.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalPsychomotor PerformanceTouch PerceptionAdultFemaleFingersHumansMaleYoung Adultforward modelperceptionsensory attenuation

Identifiers

PMID40531356
PMCPMC7617943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.