ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
The Amsterdam Criteria and beyond: development of a Standardized Structured Reporting (SSR) tool for diagnosis of placental pathology.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synoptic reporting : Chances and challenges for secondary use of pathology data in biobanking.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Standardized Placental Pathology Reporting: Improving Quality and Clinical Utility Recommendations From the Society for Pediatric Pathology Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force.Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of standardized reporting in placental pathology limits research scalability and clinical application despite consensus-based criteria like the Amsterdam Criteria. This study presents the development and implementation of a comprehensive Standardized Structured Reporting (SSR) tool for placental pathology. Utilizing the LogicNets© platform, the tool incorporates the Amsterdam Criteria, Freedman placental phenotype classification system, and consensus recommendations on placental examination. Development involved collaboration with placental pathology experts, literature review, and iterative feedback from pathologists to address reporting inconsistencies and ensure practicality. The SSR tool integrates evidence-based standards for examining and phenotyping the placenta, including structured gross and microscopic analyses. It introduces control mechanisms for severity grading and phenotype assignment, enabling precise assessment of placental lesions, even in multiple births. Organized into sections-Demographics, Macroscopy, Microscopy, and Group and Phenotype-it efficiently records and analyzes data. Additional functionalities include automated calculations of gross placental features, built-in controls, and versatile documentation of microscopic observations. The tool is designed for seamless integration into clinical workflows. Implementing the SSR tool could enhance placental pathology reporting quality, completeness, and consistency, facilitating large-scale analyses. Discrete data capture enables robust research, potentially improving the clinical utility and understanding of placenta-mediated diseases. However, further validation is required before widespread adoption. Embracing SSR could standardize placental examination, improve clinical interpretation, and advance research in placental pathology for enhanced utility in both research and clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.