ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Assessing the contribution of orthodontic profiles in predicting facial soft tissue thickness for forensic facial approximation.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFacial soft tissue thickness (FSTT) is essential for forensic facial approximation. Although its correlations with age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) are well documented, the potential correlations between FSTT and various orthodontic profiles-such as cephalic index (CI), skeletal class (SC), Tweed and Northwestern analyses-remain unexplored collectively. This study examined these correlations and their impact on FSTT prediction accuracy.
methodsWe analyzed 103 postmortem computed tomography datasets from Japanese cadavers aged 18-86 years. Moderate-to-high multicollinearity was identified among orthodontic profile variables (SC, Tweed, and Northwestern) and addressed using principal component analysis (PCA), yielding two principal components (PC1 and PC2). Predictive formulas were constructed incorporating age, sex, BMI, CI, PC1, and PC2. To evaluate model performance, we conducted two comparative approaches: (1) comparing root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) from the PCA-based regression model with those derived from holdout dataset's BMI-based mean estimates, and (2) with primary dataset's baseline regression model including only age, sex, and BMI, across all landmarks. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: PCA reduced multicollinearity, retaining 77% of total data variability. Based on the two comparative approaches, the PCA-based regression model demonstrated marginal improvements in predictive accuracy, as indicated by slightly lower RMSE and MAE across most landmarks. It indicates a limited yet consistent benefit of using orthodontic profiles for enhancing model accuracy beyond basic demographic predictors.
conclusionThe inclusion of orthodontic profiles demonstrated modest improvements in predictive accuracy and may enhance the interpretive value of FSTT predictive models in forensic contexts. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.