ArticleThe patient2025
Content Validity of the EQ-HWB in Caregivers of Children with Health Conditions.
Article in The patient, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the EQ-HWB-9 in a mental health sample and an investigation of modifications to items.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Trial
- Qualitative assessment of content validity of the modified EQ-HWB-9 by patients, caregivers, and social care users in the United States.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- Qualitative testing of the EQ-HWB-9 with a 'blank' EQ-HWB VAS and EQ-5D-5L with skin bolt-ons in a rare genetic skin disease population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe EQ Health and Wellbeing instrument (EQ-HWB) is a new generic instrument designed for evaluation across health, social care, community, and caregiver populations. It has 25-item (EQ-HWB) and 9-item (EQ-HWB-S) versions. Validation across target populations is needed. As the instrument remains in an 'experimental' phase, modifications are being considered, including to item wording, item order, and positive versus negative framing of three items. We aimed to investigate the content validity of the EQ-HWB for caregivers of children with chronic health conditions and explore the potential modifications.
methodsIn total, 21 caregivers from an Australian children's hospital sample completed semi-structured interviews, answering the 25 EQ-HWB items while 'thinking aloud', followed by interviewer probing. Interviews and coding focused on the COSMIN components of relevance, comprehension (understanding), and comprehensiveness.
resultsMost EQ-HWB items were relevant and well understood by participants, especially the psychosocial items (e.g., loneliness, anxiety). Some participants were confused by the wording in the seeing and hearing items, which were also less relevant in this population. The item 'feeling unsafe' was only relevant for a few participants, but most considered it important. Responses to potential modifications to items were mixed. Many participants were keen to keep the three positively worded items. Some participants suggested that finishing with positive items may mitigate negative feelings on completion.
conclusionsEQ-HWB items have high relevance and are generally well understood by caregivers of children with health conditions. We recommend endorsing the modifications we tested for the EQ-HWB-S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.