ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025
Attitudes towards stress urinary incontinence surgery in Ireland: navigating the pause on mid-urethral sling use.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical decision-making for primary stress urinary incontinence: insights from a nationwide survey of gynecologists in Turkey.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMid-urethral slings (MUS) for the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have been suspended in Ireland since July 2018, significantly impacting treatment options and clinical practice.
aimsThis study aimed to explore the attitudes of consultant obstetricians, gynaecologists, and urologists in Ireland toward SUI surgery following the MUS suspension, including their prior practices, current approaches, and views on MUS safety and potential reinstatement.
methodsA descriptive, anonymized questionnaire was electronically distributed in early 2023 to consultant members of the Irish Society of Urology and the Continence Foundation of Ireland. Non-consultants, non-medical professionals, and respondents outside Ireland were excluded. Data were analyzed using SPSS v28.
resultsBefore the 2018 suspension, 89.5% (17/19) of respondents performed SUI surgeries, with 76.5% (13/17) using MUS-retropubic and 53% (9/17) MUS-transobturator techniques. Post-suspension, 63.2% (12/19) continued performing SUI surgery, primarily urethral bulking (83.3%, 10/12). Regarding safety, 83.3% (15/18) believed MUS led to fewer instances of post-operative voiding dysfunction and 66.7% (12/18) reported fewer complications such as vault prolapse or rectocele. Notably, 44.4% (8/18) had been involved in litigation related to MUS. Despite this, 52.6% (10/19) expressed willingness to resume MUS if the suspension was lifted.
conclusionsMUS was the preferred SUI procedure prior to suspension due to perceived safety and effectiveness. Over half of consultants surveyed would consider resuming its use, highlighting a need for diverse, evidence-based treatment options and calling for a re-evaluation of the current suspension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.