Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Evaluation of local and systemic photobiomodulation in only single-implant insertion: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effects of local and systemic photobiomodulation (PBM-T) after dental surgery for single-tooth implant placement in healed sites. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-one patients were included and randomly assigned to 2 groups: PBM-T (n = 26), with local and systemic PBM-T application immediately after implant site drilling and suturing; and control group (n = 25), with PBM-T simulation. The parameters used for local PBM-T were low-intensity laser diode (Therapy EC, DMC, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), 1 J of energy per point for 10 s, energy density of 10.20 J/cm², output spot of 0.09842 cm², infrared wavelength of 808 nm and power of 100 mW/cm². Systemic PBM-T was performed using the same low-intensity laser diode. Patients received a single 10-minute systemic transdermal irradiation over the radial artery immediately after suturing, with a total energy of 60 J, energy density of 306.12 J/cm², wavelength of 660 nm, and power of 100 mW. Postoperative pain via visual analog scale (VAS), analgesic use, healing, and quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) were assessed. Results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Student-Newman-Keuls) and chi-square test.
resultsThere was no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the control and PBM-T groups (p = 0.5217). The number of analgesics taken by participants in the control group was 2.37 times higher than that taken by the PBM-T group. A significant difference in healing grades was observed between the control and PBM-T groups at both the 3-day and 7-day assessments (p = 0.0029 and p = 0.0002, respectively), with the PBM-T group demonstrating marked improvement. There was no negative impact on quality of life at any point after implant placement in the PBM-T group, as all OHIP-14 scores remained lower than those obtained before surgery.
conclusionsThe combined use of local and systemic PBM-T decreased the need for postoperative analgesics, enhanced postoperative healing, and improved quality of life for patients undergoing single-tooth implant placement in healed sites. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The clinical application of systemic PBM-T enhances the effects of local PBM-T after dental surgery for implant placement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), with the identifier RBR-7f42fs5, on Nov 30, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40531278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.