Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531240›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2025

Long term outcomes following embolisation of bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries for the management of haemoptysis - a 20-year experience.

Shyamal Patel, Lucy Rose Howroyd, Helen Bucknall, Hussain Memon, Robert Morgan, Joo-Young Chun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shyamal PatelGeorge's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK. shyamal.patel@stgeorges.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9743-0522
Lucy Rose HowroydGeorge's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Helen BucknallGeorge's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Hussain MemonGeorge's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Robert MorganGeorge's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Joo-Young ChunGeorge's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchial artery embolisation (BAE) is considered the most effective non-surgical technique for management of moderate-massive haemoptysis. Associated risks include neurological compromise such as stroke and spinal cord ischaemia. We aim to evaluate post-procedural outcomes and complication rates. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted for BAE cases performed between January 2002-June 2022 in a London teaching hospital. Data was collected from electronic medical records and Picture Archiving Communications System (PACS). Primary outcomes were measured, and statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors for haemoptysis recurrence.

resultsOne hundred eleven patients underwent 141 procedures with technical success achieved in 87.8% and clinical success in 84.8%. The most common causes of haemoptysis were aspergilloma (24.8%), bronchiectasis (19.1%) and malignancy (11.3%). Haemoptysis recurrence occurred in 65 cases (46%) with 20 patients undergoing repeat embolisation. Aspergillosis, cystic fibrosis, and non-tuberculous pneumonia were identified as risk factors for recurrent haemoptysis (p < 0.005). Pre-procedure MDCTA did not improve technical success. The rate of stroke in the cohort was 6.4% (9 cases), which is more so than quoted in the literature. Four of these patients presented with apical cavitations secondary to infection (aspergilloma or bacterial pneumonia).

conclusionsBAE is an effective endovascular treatment in patients with massive and recurrent haemoptysis. However, there is a well-documented risk of recurrent symptoms and early mortality, particularly in the setting of aspergilloma, cystic fibrosis and non-tuberculous pneumonia. The risk of stroke should not be underestimated. Patients should be counselled appropriately during informed consent prior to embarking on BAE.

Indexed as

AspergillomaBronchial artery embolizationHaemoptysis

Identifiers

PMID40531240
PMCPMC12176713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.