ArticleArchives of microbiology2025
Comprehensive validation of bactericidal efficacy of umbelliferone against multidrug-resistant pathogens through multifaceted antimicrobial assays.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of antigonorrhoeal phytochemical lead compounds using a metabolomics-guided approach.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Metabolomic Profiling of Commercial Tomato Puree by One-Shot Mass Spectrometry-Based Analysis: A Qualitative Perspective.Metabolites · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural plants products and their derivatives have emerged as a promising candidate to address antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria due to their diverse chemical structures and potent antimicrobial activity. One such coumarin-based derivative known as umbelliferone (7-hydroxycoumarin) is particularly known for its high antibacterial and antibiofilm activities. This compound is commonly found in both Rutaceae and Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) plant families. The present study focuses on investigating antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of umbelliferone and elucidating its mechanism of action against Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The bactericidal efficacy of umbelliferone was determined using microtiter broth dilution, agar well diffusion and time-kill curve assays. The results showed complete inhibition at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.31 mg mL− 1 (1.92 µM) for B. cereus and 0.62 mg mL− 1 (3.85 µM) for both K. pneumoniae and B. subtilis. Notably, agar diffusion assays revealed that umbelliferone was most effective against K. pneumoniae as compared to other tested strains. Further assays evaluating antibiofilm and exopolysaccharide inhibition demonstrated that the umbelliferone could significantly suppressed the growth of tested strains and inhibited biofilm formation in concentration-dependent manner. The most notable effects were observed at 1MIC, where umbelliferone achieved maximum biofilm inhibition (85.86 ± 2.10%) and reduced exopolysaccharide production to 10.07 ± 1.58 µg mL⁻¹ against B. cereus and B. subtilis, respectively. Additionally, umbelliferone triggered a time-dependent release of intracellular proteins, and propidium iodide staining under fluorescence microscopy indicated membrane disruption. These findings were corroborated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which revealed deformation of the bacterial cell membrane and leakage of intracellular contents. Overall, the findings suggest that umbelliferone is a promising candidate for managing drug-resistant infections, primarily acting through bacterial cell membranes, a mechanism that indicates a low potential for resistance development, making it an ideal antibacterial agent or adjuvant to enhance the efficacy of existing antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40531236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.