Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531075›Full record

ArticleJACC. Asia2025

Noncoronary Sinus Pivot Implantation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Valve for Aortic Regurgitation.

Lifan Yang, Zilong Weng, Shasha Chen, Yuan Zhang, Daxin Zhou, Wenzhi Pan, Junbo Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lifan YangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Geriatric medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Zilong WengDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shasha ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Daxin ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenzhi PanDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: peden@sina.com.
Junbo GeDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur initial study suggested that patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding valve for pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR) had a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when the noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) was achieved.

objectivesThis study enrolled patients with PNAR who underwent TAVR with self-expanding valves between January 2019 and April 2024, compared the NCPI strategy with the conventional approach, and analyzed factors associated with successful NCPI.

methodsWe divided 87 patients into an early (conventional) group of patients treated before February 2023 and a late (NCPI strategy) group of patients treated after February 2023. Then the patients were also categorized by successful NCPI and non-NCPI group.

resultsThe late group had significantly higher device success rates than the early group (92.9% vs 73.3%; P = 0.016) and lower rates of MACE (19.5% vs 51.1%; P = 0.002) and valve-in-valve implantation (4.8% vs 24.4%; P = 0.01). Importantly, NCPI was achieved in 90.5% of patients in the late group compared with only 17.8% in the early group (P < 0.001). The NCPI group had a higher device success rate (93.5% vs 70.7%; P = 0.005) and lower MACE rate (17.4%vs 56.1%; P < 0.001) than the non-NCPI group. NCPI (OR: 6.71; P = 0.032) and aortic angulation (OR: 1.07; P = 0.035) were independent predictors of device success.

conclusionsNCPI strategy could be a general method used in TAVR with a self-expanding valve for patients with PNAR, which had a higher device success rate and lower rate of complications than the conventional method.

Indexed as

aortic regurgitationpermanent pacemaker implantationself-expanding valvetranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID40531075
PMCPMC12277193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.