Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530959›Full record

Trial reporteLife2025

A causal role of the NMDA receptor in recurrent processing during perceptual integration.

Samuel Noorman, Timo Stein, Jasper Zantvoord, Johannes Fahrenfort, Simon van Gaal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel NoormanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0953-1070
Timo SteinDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-0933
Jasper ZantvoordDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-902X
Johannes Fahrenfort *Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-3436
Simon van Gaal *Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-4534

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 10.3030/715605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual inference requires the integration of visual features through recurrent processing, the dynamic exchange of information between higher- and lower-level cortical regions. While animal research has demonstrated a crucial role of NMDA receptors in recurrent processing, establishing a causal link between NMDA receptors and recurrent processing in humans has remained challenging. Here, we report two pharmacological studies with randomized, double-blind, crossover designs in which we administered the NMDA antagonist memantine, while collecting human electroencephalography (EEG). We trained and tested EEG classifiers to reflect the processing of specific stimulus features with increasing levels of complexity, namely differences in stimulus contrast, collinearity between local line elements, and illusory surfaces of a Kanizsa triangle. In two experiments involving different participants and visual tasks, we found that memantine selectively improved decoding of the Kanizsa illusion, known to depend on recurrent processing, while leaving decoding of contrast and collinearity largely unaffected. Interestingly, the results from an attentional blink (experiment 1) and task-relevance manipulation (experiment 2) showed that memantine was only effective when the stimulus was attended and consciously accessed. These findings suggest that NMDA inhibition through memantine enhances recurrent processing, especially for attended objects, and thereby provide a crucial step toward bridging animal and human research, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underpinning perceptual inference and conscious perception.

Indexed as

Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateVisual PerceptionAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleMemantineYoung AdultExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMemantineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateattentionconsciousnesshumanmemantineneuroscienceNMDA receptorperceptual integrationrecurrent processing

Identifiers

PMID40530959
PMCPMC12176389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.