Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530828›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2025

Selective Oxidation of Disparate Functional Groups Mediated by a Common Aspartic Acid-Based Peptide Catalyst Platform.

Susannah E Huth, Elizabeth A Stone, Scott J Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susannah E HuthDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-2794-1022
Elizabeth A StoneDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut 06824, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2253-3452
Scott J MillerDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7817-1318

Funding

Site-Selective Catalysis for Bioactive Scaffold DiversificationR35GM132092 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Scott J Miller · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM132092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As drug molecules become increasingly complex, the need to develop new or improved strategies for the efficient and selective synthesis and editing of bioactive compounds grows. Inspired by the high selectivity and fast rates exhibited in many enzymatic reactions to assemble complex natural products, our group and others have developed peptide-based catalysts to mediate synthetically relevant transformations that can be orthogonal, or akin to, native enzymatic reactivity. Peptide catalysts offer several useful features, such as modularity, ease of synthesis, and often enhanced compatibility with synthetic reaction conditions.In one intriguing area, our group has employed the proteinogenic amino acid aspartic acid (Asp) as a catalytic residue embedded within short peptide sequences to selectively introduce a singular oxygen atom into increasingly complex scaffolds, which might constitute a type of single atom editing. Our strategy has involved the development of an aspartic acid/peracid catalytic shuttle, a mechanism that, to our knowledge, has not yet been documented in enzymes.Our foray into Asp-catalyzed oxidation began with the discovery of a peptide sequence to impart enantioselectivity in the epoxidation of minimal olefins. This platform was then extended to include nucleophilic Baeyer-Villiger oxidations and electrophilic

Indexed as

Aspartic AcidPeptidesCatalysisOxidation-ReductionStereoisomerismAspartic AcidPeptides

Identifiers

PMID40530828
PMCPMC12226787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.