ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026
Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations.
Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Conservation Strategies for the Oravka Chicken: Advances in Cryopreservation Technologies for Endangered Poultry Genetic Resources-A Literature Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Restructuring breeding programs 1: Integration of diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic diversity is essential for the sustainability and adaptability of populations, and is thus a central pillar of the agro-ecological transition. However, within a population, it is inevitable that some amount of genetic variability is lost, and efforts must be made to limit this as much as possible. A valuable tool in this endeavour could be the use of cryopreserved genetic resources in cryobanks, which could assist in the management of various animal populations in the contexts of both selection and conservation. We performed simulations that revealed that the most appropriate use of ex situ genetic resources depends on characteristics of the target population and its management objectives. For populations under conservation, the aim is to maintain genetic diversity, which was best achieved by the regular use of cryopreserved genetic resources at each generation. For populations under selection, instead, the concern is the addition of additive genetic variability, which benefited from the use of cryopreserved collections over only a few generations based primarily on the genetic values of donors. The use of cryopreserved semen had a beneficial effect when breeding objectives were changed. In both cases, the use of cryopreserved individuals in animal populations requires a large amount of reproductive material: for breeds under selection because the number of offspring is high, and for breeds under conservation because the frozen semen is used repeatedly over a long period. The use of cryopreserved material appears to be an effective means of managing the genetic variability of an animal population, either by slowing down the erosion of variability or by helping to redirect a selection objective. However, care must be taken with populations under selection to limit the disadvantages associated with the reintroduction of old genetic material, in particular the gap in breeding values for traits of interest. Finally, our study highlights the need for a sufficiently large stock of cryopreserved material in collections (e.g., number of doses, straws) to ensure the most efficient use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.