ArticleIUCrJ2025
Benchmarking quantum chemical methods with X-ray structures via structure-specific restraints.
Article in IUCrJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrogen Bonding in Chloro- and Hydroxy-7-Azaindoles: Insights from X-Ray, Vibrational Spectroscopy, and DFT Studies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need for fast, efficient and accurate solid-state structure optimization for imprecise crystal structures (`augmentation') for subsequent property prediction in the pharmaceutical industry. Crystal structures from single-crystal X-ray, 3D electron or powder diffraction are widely available but require augmentation to the same quality level for comparative studies. Properties can be best calculated when the level of theory is alike and the accuracy, as well as the precision, are high. Moreover, the size of molecules and the complexity of structures encountered in pharmaceutical research are increasing. Efficient procedures are thus required that can also treat structures with disorder and several molecules in the asymmetric unit of the unit cell. Hence, we investigated whether `molecule-in-cluster' (MIC) computations [Dittrich et al. (2020). CrystEngComm 22, 7420-7431] can reach the accuracy of full-periodic (FP) computations. Selected quantum mechanical methods are assessed. The evaluation criterion is how well the structures of 22 very low temperature high-quality structures are reproduced. Computational efficiency is also considered. A novel approach to evaluating the accuracy of quantum mechanical predictions is enforcing computed structure-specific restraints in crystallographic least-squares refinements. To complement this approach, root mean square Cartesian displacements of computed and experimental structures were also compared. Analysis shows that (a) MIC DFT-D computations in a quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM:MM) framework provide improved restraints and coordinates over earlier MIC GFN2-xTB computations, (b) increasing QM basis-set size in MIC QM:MM does not systematically improve computations, and (c) the choice of DFT functional is less important than the choice of the basis set. Overall, MIC computations are an accurate and computationally efficient tool for solid-state structure optimization that can match FP computations to augment experimental structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.