ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Impact of Transport Method in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Patient Outcomes: Real-World Data From the ACSIS Registry.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Self-Transport Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Analysis.Circulation reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ambulance system is vital for the early management of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, reducing delays in diagnosis and treatment. This study examined the impact of transport mode on reperfusion therapy and mortality among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from 2000 to 2021.
methodsData from the ACSIS (Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey) registry 2000 to 2021 were analyzed. Three transport methods of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were evaluated. The impact on patient outcomes was assessed. Temporal trends from early (2000-2010) and late (2013-2021) periods were compared.
resultsOf 8035 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, 52.9% were transported by mobile intensive care units, 13.1% by basic life support ambulances, and 34% self-transported. Use of mobile intensive care units increased from 48.7% to 60.9% (
conclusionsImproved major adverse cardiovascular event and mortality rates are attributed to enhanced in-hospital and postdischarge care, including primary percutaneous coronary intervention and guideline-directed medical therapy rather than transport improvements, although these contribute to more stable arrival conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.