ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Exploring LLM-powered multi-session human-robot interactions with university students.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This exploratory study investigates how open-domain, multi-session interactions with a large language model (LLM)-powered social humanoid robot (SHR), EMAH, affect user perceptions and willingness for adoption in a university setting. Thirteen students (5 female, 8 male) engaged with EMAH across four weekly sessions, utilizing a compact open-source LLM (Flan-T5-Large) to facilitate multi-turn conversations. Mixed-method measures were employed, including subjective ratings, behavioral observations, and conversational analyses. Results revealed that perceptions of robot's sociability, agency, and engagement remained stable over time, with engagement sustained despite repeated exposure. While perceived animacy increased with familiarity, disturbance ratings did not significantly decline, suggesting enhanced lifelikeness of SHR without reducing discomfort. Observational data showed a mid-study drop in conversation length and turn-taking, corresponding with technical challenges such as slower response generation and speech recognition errors. Although prior experience with robots weakly correlated with rapport, it did not significantly predict adoption willingness. Overall, the findings highlight the potential for LLM-powered robots to maintain open-domain interactions over time, but also underscore the need for improving technical robustness, adapting conversation strategies by personalization, and managing user expectations to foster long-term social engagement. This work provides actionable insights for advancing humanoid robot deployment in educational environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.