Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530356›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025

Factors related to dosing frequency and route of administration in methotrexate intolerance among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Haya M Almalag, Jawza F Alsabhan, Abdurhman S Alarfaj, Eman Alfi, Shorouq Albalawi, Asma A Al-Shadaawi, Sahar A Alshehri, Ghadah Asaad Assiri, Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Mohammed A Omair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haya M AlmalagDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, P.O. Box 2457, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-556X
Jawza F AlsabhanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdurhman S AlarfajRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Eman AlfiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shorouq AlbalawiKing Abdulaziz Medical City of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asma A Al-ShadaawiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sahar A AlshehriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadah Asaad AssiriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim AlmaghlouthRheumatology Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A OmairRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9373-5473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methotrexate is central to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, its use is often limited by methotrexate intolerance. Objectives: This study aims to explore the association between alternative methotrexate dosing methods and methotrexate intolerance. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on patients with RA receiving methotrexate for at least 3 months at the outpatient clinic of King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The electronic survey collected data on demographics, marital and educational status, methotrexate use, Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), and Health Assessment Questionnaire. Statistical analyses (univariate and linear or logistic regression) were conducted to evaluate the associations between the administration methods and methotrexate intolerance (MISS ⩾6). Results: The study included 154 patients, predominantly female (89%; mean age (standard deviation, ±SD): 50 (±12) years). Methotrexate tolerance was observed in 64% of the participants, while 36% had a MISS above the cutoff point of 6, indicating intolerance. Methotrexate-intolerant patients were younger (mean age (±SD): 47 (±12) years) than tolerant patients (mean age (±SD): 54 (±12) years; Conclusion: Methotrexate tolerance was not associated with different administration methods: split-dose versus single weekly dose, or subcutaneous versus oral administration.

Indexed as

methotrexate intolerancerheumatoid arthritisroute of administrationsplit dosesubcutaneous

Identifiers

PMID40530356
PMCPMC12171254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.