ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Comparison of load-to-failure in pre-shaped versus surgeon-shaped Achilles tendon allograft bone blocks.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Traditional bone-plug allografts in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears require shaping of the bone plug by surgeons, yielding inconsistent results, greater costs, and increased operative time. We compare the load-to-failure between pre-shaped and surgeon-shaped Achilles allografts with calcaneal bone blocks to assess their use in ACL reconstruction. Methods: Six pre-shaped Achilles allograft tendons with calcaneus bone grafts were compared to 6 surgeon-shaped allografts. Calcaneal grafts were inserted into artificial saw bone while the opposite ends were fixed to a linear-torsion dynamic test machine for cyclic and load-to-failure testing. Loading began with a preconditioning phase, followed by uniaxial cycles. Failure load was and mechanism of failure for each graft was identified. Results: Of the 6 pre-shaped bone grafts, 3 (50 %) experienced a failure at the sawbone/screw interface, 2 (33 %) experienced a bone graft fracture, and 1 (17 %) a tendon avulsion during cycling. Of the 6 surgeon-shaped bone grafts, 3 (50 %) experienced failure at the sawbone screw interface, and 3 (50 %) experienced a bone block fracture. No significant differences in biomechanical properties measured during load-to-failure testing or failure modes were detected between the two graft types. Conclusion: Pre-shaped grafts exhibited a trend towards higher load and displacement at failure, although this was not statistically significant. These findings, along with potential cost and time savings, warrant further study on their impact on surgical efficiency and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.