ArticleCureus2025
Biomechanical Analysis of Angled Abutments in the Anterior Maxilla: Impact of Bone Quality and Loading Conditions Using Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Applicability of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Implant Planning and Surgical Guide Design in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Effect of implant tilt and trans-mucosal abutment angulation as influencing stress pattern: An FEA study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Mechanical performance of narrow dental implants with varying lengths and angled abutments.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis in vitro study utilized three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the stress distribution around dental implants in the anterior maxilla, focusing on the interplay between 15 METHODOLOGY: Anatomically accurate 3D models of the anterior maxilla, a titanium Internal-Hex implant system (Touareg
resultsAxial loading showed uniform stress at the implant neck, with cortical bone stress increasing from 12.023 MPa (D1) to 26.438 MPa (D4) and implant stress increasing from 67.319 MPa to 72.291 MPa. Oblique loading amplified stress asymmetrically, with cortical bone stress increasing from 20.005 to 30.704 MPa and implant stress from 97.910 to 102.458 MPa. D3 and D4 exhibit significantly higher stresses, particularly under oblique loading.
conclusionBone quality and loading type critically influenced stress distribution. The stresses were higher in the D3 and D4 bones under oblique loading. Bone D1 and D2 provided robust support, whereas bones D3 and D4 required enhanced implant designs or augmentation. The 15
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.