ArticleCureus2025
Primary Ovarian Malignant Melanoma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary ovarian melanoma (POM) is an exceedingly rare and aggressive form of melanoma that arises in the ovaries, distinct from metastatic ovarian melanoma, which is far more common. The rarity of this condition, coupled with its clinical similarities to other types of ovarian malignancies, makes it a challenging entity to diagnose and manage. We present the case of a 56-year-old woman who underwent a laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to pelvic organ prolapse and a left adnexal mass. The final histology showed a POM. She received adjuvant immunotherapy, and a year after the initial diagnosis, the patient remains alive and well, without any signs of recurrence or distant disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.