Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530211›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Coexistence of Nocturia and Frailty and Its Effect on Polypharmacy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Kyo Takahashi, Tomoki Tanaka, Yasuyo Yoshizawa, Mahiro Fujisaki-Sueda-Sakai, Katsuya Iijima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyo TakahashiInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JPN.
Tomoki TanakaInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JPN.
Yasuyo YoshizawaFaculty of International Liberal Arts, Juntendo University, Tokyo, JPN.
Mahiro Fujisaki-Sueda-SakaiInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JPN.
Katsuya IijimaInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly interventions for nocturia and frailty are increasingly emphasized to extend healthy life expectancy. These interventions may lead to an increase in the number of drugs administered, potentially resulting in polypharmacy. This study examined the association between nocturia, coexisting frailty, and polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults.

methodsWe selected 891 older adults without cognitive dysfunction (470 men, 421 women) from a population-based study conducted in 2016 in Kashiwa City, Japan. The association between nocturia, frailty, and polypharmacy was evaluated using sex-stratified logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe prevalence of nocturia, frailty, and their coexistence was 56.4%, 6.2%, and 4.0% in men, and 35.2%, 3.8%, and 2.6% in women, respectively. Polypharmacy was observed in 19.4% of men and 13.1% of women. Compared to the group without nocturia or frailty, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for polypharmacy was 2.47 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-4.71) in men and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.50-1.95) in women in the group with either nocturia or frailty. The AORs for the group with both nocturia and frailty were 5.33 (95% CI: 1.56-18.17) in men and 1.20 (95% CI: 0.23-6.17) in women.

conclusionPolypharmacy is more likely in older men when nocturia and frailty coexist. It is important to ensure that the treatment of nocturia and frailty does not result in a significant increase in the number of medications prescribed.

Indexed as

frailtyhealthy agingnocturiaolder adultpolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID40530211
PMCPMC12170956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.