ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Developing a prognostic risk model based on circulating tumor cell genes to predict prognosis and provide potential therapeutic strategies in colorectal cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erratum: Developing a prognostic risk model based on circulating tumor cell genes to predict prognosis and provide potential therapeutic strategies in colorectal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based prognostic model using mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes for colorectal cancer patients.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Understanding the genetic and molecular alterations in CRC can improve patient outcomes. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are crucial in cancer metastasis and progression. Analyzing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CTCs and CRC may provide us with new therapeutic strategies. Therefore, this study aims to analyze these DEGs to construct a prognostic risk model that predicts the outcomes of CRC patients and guides clinical treatment. Methods: We analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to identify 1,727 DEGs between CRC and normal samples, and GSE82198 data to find 3,564 DEGs between CTCs and primary CRC samples. Using enrichment analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and stepwise Cox regression, we derived eight model genes to construct a prognostic risk model. Various algorithms were employed in the immune microenvironment analysis. Integrating clinical factors with risk grouping, we developed a nomogram. We assessed chemotherapy sensitivity and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) scores in high-/low-risk groups and explored model gene expression at the single-cell level. Results: We constructed a prognostic risk model for CRC based on eight DEGs of CTCs. The model effectively predicted treatment outcomes and correlated closely with actual prognosis. Through immune microenvironment analysis, we revealed differences in immune cell infiltration and checkpoint gene expression among different risk groups. Moreover, patients in the high-risk group showed higher sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs compared to those in the low-risk group. Conclusions: The prognosis model based on CTCs' DEGs can effectively predict patient outcomes, facilitating precision treatment for patients. This model holds significant guiding implications for immunotherapy and chemotherapy in CRC, offering potential strategies for the clinical treatment of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.