ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Development of a prognostic model for overall survival in neuroblastoma based on Schwann cell-specific genes, clinical predictors, and MYCN amplification.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of a novel PANoptosis-associated prognostic signature and immune landscape analysis in neuroblastoma with experimental validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroblastoma (NBL) is a common pediatric malignancy with diverse prognoses influenced by multiple factors. Accurate overall survival (OS) predictions are essential for guiding treatment. However, the contribution of specific cell types within the tumor microenvironment (TME), which significantly influence disease progression, is often overlooked. This study aimed to develop an NBL prognostic model that incorporates TME, genetic, and clinical factors to improve prediction accuracy and clinical relevance. Methods: Data were collected from the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) database (n=106, test set) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (n=238, train set). Including clinical details such as MYCN amplification, International NBL Staging System (INSS) stage, age at diagnosis, and OS outcomes. Additionally, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from 16 NBL patients (160,910 cells) were included to improve model precision. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) was utilized for cell clustering, while weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) helped identify cell-type-specific modules. Prognostic genes were pinpointed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, which also served to refine the model by integrating essential clinical variables and molecular markers. The model's effectiveness was assessed through Kaplan-Meier survival curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and calibration plots. Additional evaluations included immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity analysis. Results: MYCN amplification was present in 79.4% of patients in the train set and 79.2% of patients in the test set, and the majority of patients in both cohorts were classified as Stage 4. The median age at diagnosis was 399.5 days in the train set and 1,069 days in the test set. Key findings demonstrate that Schwann cell-specific genes ( Conclusions: This study developed a model for predicting OS in NBL by integrating Schwann cell-specific genes, clinical factors, and the TME. The model highlights the importance of specific cellular contributions to prognosis and provides a more personalized approach to NBL treatment, particularly for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.