ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio in first-line chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on lactate metabolism in lung cancer: Tumorigenesis, drug resistance and clinical translation (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- LAR/NMLR stratify mortality risk before and after checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in NSCLC: multi-state and time-dependent analyses.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- A predictive model for immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer based on peripheral blood.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Pretreatment Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-Albumin Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of baseline systemic inflammation markers in PD-L1-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with the BRICS sequential regimen.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with platinum-based dual chemotherapy has been widely used as first-line treatment modality for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the potential value of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) in predicting treatment efficacy in these patients. Methods: A total of 110 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy between January 2021 and March 2024 at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, were enrolled. In different subgroups, according to a 50% ratio, patients were divided into high baseline LAR and low baseline LAR groups and their progression-free survival (PFS) was compared. Then univariate and multivariate cox hazard analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of PFS. Finally, a nomogram was constructed to intuitively show the results. Results: The PFS of patients with high baseline LAR was significantly shorter than that of patients with low baseline LAR, regardless of whether in the overall patient population, different staging subgroups, or different pathological type subgroups (P<0.01). Based on multivariate cox analysis, age, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) and baseline LAR were identified as independent indicators affecting PFS. Then a nomogram based on these three predictors was constructed accordingly and its C-index was 0.801 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.747-0.855]. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that LAR is a useful prognostic predictor in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.