ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Assessing stigma in a predominantly male hemophilia population: a Chinese cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers to social participation among patients with hemophilia: a qualitative study using social-ecological systems theory.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemophilia is a rare hereditary disorder characterized by impaired blood clotting, with prevalence of 2.73 per 100,000 individuals in China. Advancements in medical technology have significantly improved patient survival, however, individuals with hemophilia continue to experience chronic pain, recurrent joint hemorrhages, and functional impairments, particularly in the limbs. These physical challenges often lead to psychological issues such as anxiety and depression, contributing to heightened stigma. This study aimed to assess the current level of stigma among patients with hemophilia and to identify associated influencing factors. Methods: Convenience sampling was applied to recruit patients from a hemophilia treatment center. As hemophilia predominantly affects males, the sample consisted of 231 males and one female (consistent with epidemiological sex ratios in China). The Social Impact Scale (SIS; 24 items, score range: 24-96, higher scores = greater stigma) and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS; 10 items, score range: 12-66, higher scores = greater support) were used to assess stigma and social support, respectively. Multiple linear regression was employed to analyze factors associated with stigma. Results: The mean total stigma score among hemophilia patients was 63.88 ± 15.27. Multiple linear regression revealed that higher social support ( Conclusions: Stigma among patients with hemophilia is at a moderate to severe level. Targeted interventions should be prioritized for unmarried patients, those facing financial hardship, individuals with lower limb disabilities, and those experiencing frequent bleeding episodes. Enhancing psychological health education and social support is essential in mitigating stigma among hemophilia patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.