ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Adolescents' experiences of psychological treatment for gaming disorder: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gaming disorder is a recently recognized psychiatric condition and a growing public health concern, particularly among adolescents. Despite this, there is limited research on what kind of treatment they need. Existing studies are mostly quantitative and offer limited insight into adolescents' lived experiences. Aim: The aim of this qualitative study is to explore how adolescent patients perceive their gaming as a problem and their experiences of psychological treatment for gaming disorder. Method: We used a qualitative descriptive approach and conducted semi-structed interviews with eight male patients (aged 13-19) about their experiences of psychological treatment for gaming disorder at a specialized clinic. The treatment is a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and family therapy. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Participants generally reported positive treatment experiences, especially the value of combining family therapy with individual CBT. They appreciated the broad focus of the treatment, which addressed not only gaming but also problems in other life areas such as school, sleep, and family relationships. Notably, most did not describe gaming as their main problem, but they connected their gaming to difficulties in other areas of life. Conclusion: These findings suggest that effective treatment for gaming disorder should address the broader psychosocial context in which gaming occurs. Patients do not always view gaming as their primary problem, and clinicians should be cautious about framing it as such. Instead, gaming should be explored in connection with other life difficulties. It is helpful when clinicians demonstrate knowledge about gaming and avoid coming across as critical of the gaming. Integrating family therapy into CBT-based interventions appears clinically valuable and warrants further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.