Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530038›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

The virgin lands campaign and the occurrence of foot-and-mouth disease and anthrax in the Republic of Kazakhstan (1955-1970).

Yersyn Y Mukhanbetkaliyev, Ablaikhan S Kadyrov, Maxat A Berdikulov, Aizada A Mukhanbetkaliyeva, Alimzhan S Kadyrov, Assylbek A Zhanabayev, Fedor I Korennoy, Andres M Perez, Sarsenbay K Abdrakhmanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yersyn Y MukhanbetkaliyevFaculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Ablaikhan S KadyrovFaculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Maxat A BerdikulovRSE National Veterinary Reference Center, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Aizada A MukhanbetkaliyevaFaculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Alimzhan S KadyrovFaculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Assylbek A ZhanabayevFaculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Fedor I KorennoyFederal Centre for Animal Health (FGBI ARRIAH), Vladimir, Russia.
Andres M PerezCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Sarsenbay K AbdrakhmanovFaculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The campaign for the development of virgin lands in Kazakhstan (1955-1970) was one of the most ambitious programs implemented by the Soviet government, which, arguably, resulted in both positive and negative consequences for the country. The campaign brought, at the same time, development, environmental degradation, and a dramatic cultural change to Kazakhstan. A barely explored aspect of the virgin lands campaign is related to its impact on the epidemiology of animal diseases. This paper describes, for the first time, the changes experienced by Kazakhstan during the implementation of the virgin lands campaign, offering a perspective on how those changes may have affected the occurrence of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and anthrax. Newly organized livestock premises and processing plants were created, which increased the concentration and intensification of animal production, in the absence of effective disease control plans. The initial increase in FMD prevalence may have been explained by the concentration of susceptible animals in the absence of appropriate control measures, followed by a decrease in disease incidence, probably explained by the enhancement of control measures associated with the formalization of livestock production, including improvements in vaccine quality. In contrast, soil degradation and the increase in the number of livestock, which resulted in a large number of animals buried in inappropriate conditions, may explain the sustained increase in the incidence of anthrax. The results presented here help to document the history of animal diseases in the country and ultimately contribute to the design of holistic strategies to support Kazakhstan's development.

Indexed as

anthraxepidemiologyfoot-and-mouth diseaseKazakhstanvirgin lands campaign

Identifiers

PMID40530038
PMCPMC12171232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.