Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40530010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Reducing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS 4 lesions based on a deep learning model for mammography.

Yuting Yang, Tingting Liao, Xiaohui Lin, Rushan Ouyang, Zhenjie Cao, Jingtao Hu, Jie Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuting YangShenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Tingting LiaoShenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaohui LinShenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Rushan OuyangDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenjie CaoShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jingtao HuDepartment of Pathology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jie MaShenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to explore the diagnostic value of a deep learning (DL) model based on mammography for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions and to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical and imaging data of 557 BI-RADS 4 lesions (304 benign lesions, 195 malignant lesions, and 58 high-risk lesions which have risk of developing malignancy) obtained by mammography at Shenzhen People's Hospital and Luohu People's Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. The DL model was constructed to predict the pathological classifications of these lesions, calculated its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and evaluated its diagnostic performance using receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Results: This study included 557 patients with BI-RADS 4 lesions, including 381 patients (68.40%) with BI-RADS 4A, 106 patients (19.03%) with BI-RADS 4B, and 70 patients (12.57%) with BI-RADS 4C. For BI-RADS categories 4A, 4B, and 4C lesions, 70.9%, 27.4%, and 7.1% were respectively confirmed as benign through biopsy, surgical pathology, or follow-up. The DL model demonstrated high diagnostic performance in identifying BI-RADS 4 lesions, achieving a sensitivity of 81.0%, specificity of 76.9%, accuracy of 78.8%, and an AUC of 0.790. We found that our DL model could avoid unnecessary biopsies for BI-RADS 4 lesions by 40.6% in our included patients, reducing unnecessary biopsies for BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C lesions by 55.1%, 18.9%, and 4.29%, respectively. Conclusion: Our DL model for classifying BI-RADS 4 lesions can accurately identify benign and high-risk lesions that do not necessitate biopsy, further enhancing the safety and convenience for patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBI-RADS 4 lesionsbreast cancerdeep learningmammography

Identifiers

PMID40530010
PMCPMC12170291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.