ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Reducing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS 4 lesions based on a deep learning model for mammography.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of peripheral blood cell-free DNA breast cancer gene mutation profiling for postoperative pathological malignancy in BI-RADS 4 breast nodules.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Over-detection and over-surveillance in breast screening: current status and the potential for artificial intelligence optimisation.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aimed to explore the diagnostic value of a deep learning (DL) model based on mammography for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions and to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical and imaging data of 557 BI-RADS 4 lesions (304 benign lesions, 195 malignant lesions, and 58 high-risk lesions which have risk of developing malignancy) obtained by mammography at Shenzhen People's Hospital and Luohu People's Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. The DL model was constructed to predict the pathological classifications of these lesions, calculated its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and evaluated its diagnostic performance using receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Results: This study included 557 patients with BI-RADS 4 lesions, including 381 patients (68.40%) with BI-RADS 4A, 106 patients (19.03%) with BI-RADS 4B, and 70 patients (12.57%) with BI-RADS 4C. For BI-RADS categories 4A, 4B, and 4C lesions, 70.9%, 27.4%, and 7.1% were respectively confirmed as benign through biopsy, surgical pathology, or follow-up. The DL model demonstrated high diagnostic performance in identifying BI-RADS 4 lesions, achieving a sensitivity of 81.0%, specificity of 76.9%, accuracy of 78.8%, and an AUC of 0.790. We found that our DL model could avoid unnecessary biopsies for BI-RADS 4 lesions by 40.6% in our included patients, reducing unnecessary biopsies for BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C lesions by 55.1%, 18.9%, and 4.29%, respectively. Conclusion: Our DL model for classifying BI-RADS 4 lesions can accurately identify benign and high-risk lesions that do not necessitate biopsy, further enhancing the safety and convenience for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.