ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
"We hope to, but…": Chinese frontliners' barriers in providing psychosocial care for cancer survivors.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating fatherhood and identity reconstruction among fathers with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Return to work experience on structural constraints and gendered differences among nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Coordinated psycho-oncology in young adults with breast cancer: equity gradients, timely access, and out-of-pocket spending in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In recent years, there has been an emerging trend of psychosocial oncology caring strategies within the Chinese context. However, many survivors undergoing different stages of the cancer journey continue to report significant life disruptions and unmet psychosocial care needs. While the crucial role frontline professionals play in providing this care, little is known about the critical barriers they encounter. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the barriers Chinese frontline professionals face in providing psychosocial oncology care. Methods: This study employed a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews. Twenty oncology nurses and social workers with at least one year of experience in relevant specializations were recruited. The interview data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to identify themes. Results: Three dominant themes and subthemes were identified: (1) Overburdened clinical work and inadequate training, (2) Emotional and social struggles faced by survivors and their families that hinder the employment of psychosocial care, (3) System failures: social, structural, and policy barriers. Conclusions: The findings shed light on the complexities and barriers among frontline professionals in providing psychosocial oncology care. A central paradox emerged between professionals' desire to offer comprehensive care and the systemic barriers encountered, including limited institutional support and resources, and low public awareness. This study highlighted the need for a context-specific psychosocial oncology framework for research and practice. Interdisciplinary collaboration should be made among research, policy, and social education, which aims to enrich public awareness of psychosocial oncology and provide financial and resource support for practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.