ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2025
Evaluating liver resection outcomes post Y90 TARE with personalized dosimetry in intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a focus on surgical and biliary complications.
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Indications and Outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While preliminary reports on resection following downstaging using transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) reported promising oncological outcomes, there's a notable gap in the literature concerning post operative morbidity. Contrary to post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), damages to the bile ducts and their potential consequences have been poorly evaluated. Thus, our aim was to explore postoperative complications in HCC patients undergoing liver resection after Y90 TARE, focusing particularly on biliary complications. Methods: Conducted from June 2015 to December 2022, this retrospective study involved 30 HCC patients undergoing liver resection post-TARE. Comprehensive data on surgical procedures, complications, and follow-up were collected. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, starting with univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis, focusing on variables with a significance level below P<0.2. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) in the TARE-treated area was 97% at 3 months. Survival outcomes showed a median overall survival (OS) of 5.1 years and progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5 years post-liver resection. The study found a 40% (12 out of 30 patients) rate of severe postoperative complications and a 7% (2 out of 30 patients) 90-day mortality rate. After liver resection, grade B bile leaks occurred in 20% (6 out of 30) of patients, with a third experiencing recurrence. Biliary-specific mortality was 9%. After multivariate analysis, only the interval between TARE and surgery emerged a significant risk factor for biliary complications, showing increased odds of bile leaks if surgery occurred 3-6 months post-TARE compared to after 6 months. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of timing between TARE and surgery, suggesting a waiting period of at least 6 months. Such timing not only enhances the radiation effects of TARE but also optimizes both future liver remnant growth and patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.