Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529921›Full record

ReviewHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2025

Surgery-related factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: an umbrella review.

Yu Teng, Yaoqun Wang, Sishu Yang, Guilin Nie, Ningyuan Wen, Yingyi Zhang, Nansheng Cheng, Xianze Xiong, Jiong Lu, Geng Liu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu Teng *Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yaoqun Wang *Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sishu Yang *Research Center for Biliary Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guilin NieDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ningyuan WenDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yingyi ZhangResearch Center for Biliary Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Nansheng ChengDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xianze XiongDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiong LuDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Geng LiuDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bei LiDivision of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple risk or protective factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) have been suggested in the literature of surgical specialities. We aimed to map existing evidence regarding the risk factors for POPF to help guide future clinical treatment. Methods: We performed an umbrella review by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases until June 19, 2023. Meta-analyses (MAs) that included ≥2 studies were included. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR2 scores and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tools were used to quantify the strength of the evidence. Results: Of the 42 MAs, 1 was rated as having high methodological quality, and 4 were rated as moderate. Among the 82 outcomes, 6 were supported by high-quality evidence. Moderate-quality evidence was found for 13 outcomes. The remaining outcomes had either low- or very low-quality evidence. In pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), protective factors for all-grade POPF include pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) [ Conclusions: This umbrella review found varying levels of evidence for the associations between different surgery-related risk factors for POPF. Given the wealth of existing evidence of relatively low quality, future research should focus on improving its credibility.

Indexed as

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)meta-analysis (MA)Pancreatectomypancreatic fistulaumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID40529921
PMCPMC12170120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.